The lawsuit: Pfizer sues $ 2.3 billion for “ doctor bribes and suppression of adverse test results
A viral report on social media indicates that Americans should not trust Pfizer, a leading coronavirus vaccine company, due to a lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company in 2009.
The April 26 Instagram report states that “Pfizer charged $ 2.3 billion in 2009 for” bribing doctors and suppressing negative test results. “
The caption reads: “And you still trust them ?? With your children ???”
The message apparently refers to a $ 2.3 billion deal from Pfizer in 2009, but it is misleading as to the extent of the claims being made about the deal.
Pfizer has resolved allegations of corruption and illegal commercialization of painkillers
The post apparently refers to an agreement with Pfizer in which the company pleads guilty to a federal lawsuit over the marketing of four drugs. The company agreed to pay $ 2.3 billion as part of the deal.
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company – a Pfizer subsidiary – has agreed to plead guilty to a violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act for errors in registration of the painkiller Bextra “ with intent to defraud or defraud, ” the ministry said. Justice.
By law, a company must specify the use of its product when a new FDA remedy is administered, and therefore not commercialize a product in any other way. The Justice Department writes in a press release that Pfizer is “promoting the sale of Bextra for various uses and dosages that the FDA expressly refuses to approve for safety reasons.”
The company was fined $ 1.195 billion. Pfizer also lost an additional $ 105 million. Bextra was withdrawn from the market in 2005.
Receive the FactCheck newsletter in your inbox.
Truth or Fiction? Find out the truth about the social media news you see online.
The Justice Department also said in 2009 that Pfizer had paid $ 1 billion to resolve civil crime complaints under the Illegal Claims Act, that the company had illegally promoted Bextra and three other drugs: the antipsychotic Geodon, antibiotics, Zyvox, and the anti-epileptic Lyrica.
The company has also resolved complaints about making refunds – an illegal payment in exchange for preferential treatment or compensation – to health professionals to encourage them to prescribe the drug.
Pfizer denied the civil charges, except for acknowledging Zyvox’s improper promotion, Reuters reported in 2009.
The company’s attorney general later said he regretted some actions in the past, but was proud of the actions he had taken to tighten its internal controls, Reuters reported.