If marketers use it, yes, it’s martech

Lately, there have been many opinions about the types of tools that are considered martech. Are our project management platforms comparable? Lately, there have been many opinions about the types of tools that are considered martech. These project management platforms like Work front and JIRA martech? What about collaborative platforms (like tools, not just channels) like Slack? I think yes. Making that statement requires a combination of vision, dedication, and orchestration. Even imagination and innovative thinking cannot hurt.

Consider this

There is a reason why big companies in the industry, like Adobe and Salesforce, are devouring the various companies behind the tools, from DAMs to multivariate testing and CDPs. For example, Adobe acquired only the project management company Work front. The main reason for this is that it hopes to develop an ecosystem that makes good experiences possible.

An ecosystem of resources for CMS, DAM, analysis, multivariate testing, and auditory segmentation allows automatic adjustment of multiple channels. Great players hope to be a one-stop-shop for this, but there are also integrations – which don’t happen in the same way – so that products from different ecosystems can deliver a similar synthesis.

In-house marketing and temporary workers can also reflect on the use of products without discount. For example, I once saw a product receiving alerts in one place from several paid search platforms – a collaborative tool. If a paid search specialist uses teams for most of their work, wouldn’t it be great if they also included ads and reports about Ad Words and Facebook campaigns? Why didn’t they create a channel for the team for more coverage? This helps to strengthen the arguments for categorizing these instant messaging tools developed like martech.

Dedication

The vision is just a dream without compromise.

The integration of different tools and systems requires a commitment to implementation and maintenance. It requires the acquisition and prioritization of different divisions, including IT and legal, as well as the different teams that can “own” the different elements and accelerators of the desired integration. All of these stakeholders have different objectives, programs, and priorities, which can make it difficult to combine resources for a project. Over time, dedicated organizational availability, ownership, and value become difficult to maintain. Buying is easy; implementation requires commitment.

Despite our best intentions, we all work in an environment characterized by changing priorities, evolving customers, and organizational goals. There is also staff turnover. The person with the vision and/or experience can leave before the project starts or ends. It also affects commitment.

Many Martech professionals will undoubtedly correctly point out that engagement is not just for marketers in the real estate market. Martech’s key players, bringing together different companies to add to their suites, must also commit to the vision that inspired the acquisition. Work front and JIRA martech? What about collaborative platforms (like tools, not just channels) like Slack? I think yes. Making that statement requires a combination of vision, dedication, and orchestration. Even imagination and innovative thinking cannot hurt.

Consider this

There is a reason why big companies in the industry, like Adobe and Salesforce, are devouring the various companies behind the tools, from DAMs to multivariate testing and CDPs. For example, Adobe acquired only the project management company Work front. The main reason for this is that it hopes to develop an ecosystem that makes good experiences possible.

An ecosystem of resources for CMS, DAM, analysis, multivariate testing, and auditory segmentation allows automatic adjustment of multiple channels. Great players hope to be a one-stop-shop for this, but there are also integrations – which do not happen in the same way – so that products from different ecosystems can deliver a similar synthesis.

In-house marketing and temporary workers can also reflect on the use of products without discount. For example, I once saw a product looking for ads on multiple paid search platforms in one place: a collaborative tool. If a paid search specialist uses teams for most of their work, wouldn’t it be great if they also included ads and reports about Ad Words and Facebook campaigns? Why didn’t they create a channel for the team for more coverage? Help discuss

Orchestration

Vision and dedication alone do not guarantee the transformation of a common product into a robust Martech instrument. Orchestration is also important for large Martech companies and their customers.

Orchestration involves documenting and mapping an ecosystem of suppliers and stacks of Martech organizations. In addition to detecting existing and potential integrations (and, as already mentioned, their nature) between components, this practice helps to test skills, contracts, and functionality. All this is essential for the realization of visions and the creation of a fruitful connection.

For example, many professions use project management systems and argue for and against the martech classification. It is important that creative teams in marketing departments need one with robust functionality, including application forms, project flow, dynamic approval schedules, interactive evidence for different stakeholders, and sequential process management.

However, with vision, dedication, and orchestration, a project management system can initiate a multi-level process that publishes completed and approved assets in a meta data-sensitive DAM that can automatically use a CMS, audience manager, test platform, and DSP to create new activities. as usage rights increase. expires, the conversion slows down and new customer segments appear. Understanding this from an orchestration perspective can yield multidirectional skills.

Maintaining the vision of a project manager orchestra It is important to note that the creative team’s project management system becomes too complicated for other teams, such as conversion testers and social media managers. Not many bells and whistles are needed. It can justify functional replacements in a martech stack by adding simpler and faster project management systems. With orchestration, metal plates offer more opportunities than challenges, even for doubters.

Go with “Yes”

Marketers do not have to monopolize the use of a product to qualify it as a market. Marketing departments can use different systems, such as project management and collaboration platforms, that may belong to other departments, such as martech. It requires vision, dedication, and orchestration. As boring as it may sound, why would you want to work smarter and more efficiently with the same tools you already use?

Translate »